A brand new allegation against BJP is that they are the ones who ran away from Delhi in December, 2013 since they refused to form a government despite having the largest number of seats.
Dear proponents of this theory,
Please know that without either AAP or Congress support, BJP did not have a majority. None of them (despite people insisting that BJP=Congress) would have given outside support and hence forcefully becoming CM would only have wasted governance time which Dr.Harshvardhan decided against.
AAP had Congress support which they used like a true blooded political party which had forgotten all its tall claims and statements made before elections. They managed to rule for a total of 49 days after which they resigned stating that Congress of BJP refused to get a bill into the assembly. A bill which was being introduced in an illegal manner and would have resulted in nothing but utter wastage of time if any discussions were done on it not to mention the fact that all MLA's would have been party to illegal proceedings.
During this time, they claimed that corruption was reduced and so was inflation. For a total of 49 days out of a total of 1825 days for which a rule should normally last! These claims have been supported by data collected by AAP itself. Definitely an embodiment of genuine claims.
In truth, inflation always reduced immediately before any election in India. This will obviously have an impact for at least 49 days after the second government comes to power.
In truth, during the 49 day rule, government officials were being continuously hassled and harassed by people wearing AAP caps. Forget claims of corruption, I want some independent body to actually check the output of these offices during this time compared to other times.
In truth, nothing was done to protect women in the city. Something which resulted in the wave of protests which actually brought AAP to the forefront in Delhi. In fact, an AAP leader and his gang actually went and manhandled some women who were allegedly peddling drugs. Did someone call for the absent human rights which immediately came up when a female terrorist was killed by the police in Gujarat? (and they say that its the BJP which the Congress is in cahoots with)
In truth, the entire city of Delhi was left paralyzed during most of these 49 days due to frequent protests and allegations and dharnas. Surprisingly, these were being held by the government itself! Against who...I wonder! Since they are the people who are supposed to change the laws.
In truth, AAP had not expected to win 28 seats in Delhi and once they did, they had no idea what to do since none of them are leaders. They have and continue to be a bunch of people who know how to complain and point fingers but have no idea about how to bring about solutions and change the system.
I am from Delhi. I saw the 49 day (mis)rule of AAP. I made numerous public comments before and during the rule that AAP had a great chance to really show to people that they meant what they said. Unfortunately, they proved otherwise.
Thought of making things a bit clearer on the "Delhi rule of AAP" or "AAP rule of Delhi" in this first blog post from the view of a Delhiite. All statements can be verified through media reports from that period.
Another way to verify: Lets see how many of the Delhi seats are won by AAP in the LS elections.
NG
Dear proponents of this theory,
Please know that without either AAP or Congress support, BJP did not have a majority. None of them (despite people insisting that BJP=Congress) would have given outside support and hence forcefully becoming CM would only have wasted governance time which Dr.Harshvardhan decided against.
AAP had Congress support which they used like a true blooded political party which had forgotten all its tall claims and statements made before elections. They managed to rule for a total of 49 days after which they resigned stating that Congress of BJP refused to get a bill into the assembly. A bill which was being introduced in an illegal manner and would have resulted in nothing but utter wastage of time if any discussions were done on it not to mention the fact that all MLA's would have been party to illegal proceedings.
During this time, they claimed that corruption was reduced and so was inflation. For a total of 49 days out of a total of 1825 days for which a rule should normally last! These claims have been supported by data collected by AAP itself. Definitely an embodiment of genuine claims.
In truth, inflation always reduced immediately before any election in India. This will obviously have an impact for at least 49 days after the second government comes to power.
In truth, during the 49 day rule, government officials were being continuously hassled and harassed by people wearing AAP caps. Forget claims of corruption, I want some independent body to actually check the output of these offices during this time compared to other times.
In truth, nothing was done to protect women in the city. Something which resulted in the wave of protests which actually brought AAP to the forefront in Delhi. In fact, an AAP leader and his gang actually went and manhandled some women who were allegedly peddling drugs. Did someone call for the absent human rights which immediately came up when a female terrorist was killed by the police in Gujarat? (and they say that its the BJP which the Congress is in cahoots with)
In truth, the entire city of Delhi was left paralyzed during most of these 49 days due to frequent protests and allegations and dharnas. Surprisingly, these were being held by the government itself! Against who...I wonder! Since they are the people who are supposed to change the laws.
In truth, AAP had not expected to win 28 seats in Delhi and once they did, they had no idea what to do since none of them are leaders. They have and continue to be a bunch of people who know how to complain and point fingers but have no idea about how to bring about solutions and change the system.
I am from Delhi. I saw the 49 day (mis)rule of AAP. I made numerous public comments before and during the rule that AAP had a great chance to really show to people that they meant what they said. Unfortunately, they proved otherwise.
Thought of making things a bit clearer on the "Delhi rule of AAP" or "AAP rule of Delhi" in this first blog post from the view of a Delhiite. All statements can be verified through media reports from that period.
Another way to verify: Lets see how many of the Delhi seats are won by AAP in the LS elections.
NG
No comments:
Post a Comment